
It all started for me at school. In the UK during the late 70's when I started school, it became apparent that playing football was a compulsory activity. Every games lesson was just football, cricket, rugby or some other god-awful sport and I hated it then as I do now.
Everyone seemed to have an in-depth knowledge of the rules and yet I could not fathom them back then - or indeed now - how they knew (I must have missed that lesson) or why they fucking cared.
Don't get me wrong, I can work happily as part of a team and enjoy physical exertion, but why it had to be as part of football team I'll never know. Watching it seemed to me like smelling somebody else's food while they ate it so even the spectator aspect is lost on me.
It turns my father in law into an utter child and makes people argue the toss over whether Player A who has been slotted into Team B this year will create a combination that will be more preferable than the previous attempt.
I can see how pride must have stemmed from having a team made up of locally acquired players, but now it seems like teams are constituted of players from all over the world and then branded to suit their temporary masters. Liken it to a PC cobbled together out of the highest performing parts the management can afford. Giving the team the name of the city which hosts it's home ground seems to me just a formality borne from habit. You could just as easily give them a number for the relevance to it's geographical proximity. Just how much Manchester is there in Manchester United?
As I understand it, when England play in the World Cup as a team, it is a requirement that the players are all of English nationality. Yet this qualifying specification seems totally disregarded outside of this sporting event. Most teams will sport players from all over, presumably because they are the best that money can buy and will make a difference to the teams performance. At what point does the team cease to actually represent the place to which it was originally associated? Would this have been the case 60 years ago?
I have no problem at all with foreign players playing in a team. It's not that. It's specifically the fact that it seems that Manchester United players should really come from Manchester, surely? Didn't they used to? When did it become okay for this to change?
When more half of the players have names which would make fantastic scores in scrabble (even without a Triple Word Score square) then it's a case of 'I've had the same broom for ten years. It's only had two new heads and one new handle'.
It's probably just accepted by a team due to the benefits it will bring, and related to some 'deep rooted desire to belong' psycho-babble. I don't know or really care to know the answer. I have decided it is as good a reason as any to continue disliking the game.
British comedians Mitchell and Webb have summed it up best for me in these two clips.
1. All the football, all of it mattering to someone, presumably: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VF_uOgyBK1c
2. Do you remember when we were Indiana Jones in Raiders of the Lost Ark? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBgGqsvss0o